Talent

60% of Workers Say Social Media Makes Their Company More Transparent

The Northern California Human Resource Association (NCHRA), and Waggl, the most human way for organizations to crowdsource feedback, has released new data from its joint “Voice of the Workplace” pulse on the subject of social media and transparency in the workplace.social media

The “Voice the Workplace” pulse was sent by NCHRA to over 20,000 HR professionals using Waggl’s crowdsourced listening platform from August 10, 2017 through August 25, 2017.  In this pulse, 59% of the participants responded that they agree with the following statement: “The rise of social media has made my organization more transparent.”

The responses illustrated some interesting splits across various demographics including gender, industry, and size of organization.  For example, among male participants, 68% felt that their organizations had become more transparent due to social media, whereas only 54% of female participants felt it was the case.

Among respondents from nonprofits, only 55% felt their organizations had become more transparent, in comparison with 62% from the technology industry.  Perhaps most notably, 69% of participants from large enterprise organizations with 10,000 employees or more felt that their organizations had become more transparent, in contrast with 50% from organizations with 201 to 1,000 employees.

Participants in the “Voice of the Workplace” Pulse were also asked whether, in light of recent events at Uber and Google, their organizations have changed their views or philosophy on how employees should utilize social media.   In answer to this question, only 24% of the participants said that they felt that their organizations had changed.

“Within the HR community, transparency is usually regarded as a positive attribute within the organization, because it can be used to cultivate trust,” said Greg Morton, CEO, NCHRA—in a press release.   “Unfortunately, we’ve seen several instances in the news recently that illustrate how that transparency can backfire if the organization has underlying cultural issues that haven’t been addressed.”

Morton added, “The results of this pulse indicate that social media is one of the driving factors in encouraging transparency, but it’s certainly not the only one.  Organizations don’t appear to be making changes in direct response to specific events in which employees of well-known companies have spoken out openly on social media. Nevertheless, HR professionals do believe that fostering transparency is valuable, and essential to building trust within an organization.”

In this pulse, the following question was also asked, “What is the most significant potential outcome of increased transparency within an organization?” The top 3 answers provided by the HR professionals who participated were:

  • “Increased trust between company leadership and its employees. Increased trust will drive credibility, accountability, performance and productivity and fiscal outcomes.”
  • “Increased transparency within the organization has the potential to build stronger unity among all levels of employees helping to improve communications and understanding.”
  • “Employees will feel more invested in the organization, and leadership will have to practice what they preach about company values.  If that happens a more engaged and productive workforce will emerge.”

“As we’ve seen from the responses on this pulse, social media has served as a catalyst for many companies to cultivate greater transparency, but the benefits go far beyond avoiding a negative post from an employee,” said Michael Papay, Cofounder and CEO, Waggl.   “Cultivating transparency can create a stronger sense of cohesion around the goals and vision of an organization.  Wider dispersion of knowledge builds a shared sense of purpose and investment that leads to increased inclusion, trust, engagement and accountability.  Transparency ultimately leads to better connections between people, and can help to facilitate a more agile organization.”

For additional information, see Waggl and NCHRA.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *