2004 Discrimination Employment Law Time and Attendance 
Business Management Daily
FEBRUARY 22, 2022
He shows up on time, does his job well, and is generally liked by coworkers and customers. Instead, it encourages courts to focus on whether employers have “complied with their obligations and whether discrimination has occurred. Employers dodged the bullet with this case, but they may not be so lucky next time.
HR Daily Advisor
NOVEMBER 21, 2016
Sam” began working for the city of Flushing, Michigan in 2004. Sam’s performance began to suffer about the same time. ” Also, the city required all employees to attend training on respect and responsibility in the workplace. He was reprimanded twice in early 2008 for failing to carry out his job duties.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
HR Daily Advisor
FEBRUARY 7, 2017
Imagine having difficulty scheduling childcare or attending classes after work to further your education, because your schedule was constantly changing from day to day and from week to week. If an employer adds hours to the employee’s schedule after it is posted, the employer must pay the employee for 1 additional hour.
HR Daily Advisor
DECEMBER 8, 2016
3rd Circuit Court of Appeals—which covers Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania—recently affirmed a lower court’s decision to dismiss an employee’s gender discrimination and retaliation claims against her former employer. Background. Sabrina appealed. Court’s analysis. Bottom line. Brittany E.
HR Daily Advisor
DECEMBER 15, 2016
3rd Circuit Court of Appeals—which covers Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania—recently affirmed a lower court’s decision to dismiss an employee’s gender discrimination and retaliation claims against her former employer. Background. Justine appealed. Court’s analysis. Bottom line. Brittany E.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content