Remove 2010 Remove Metrics Remove Talent Development Remove Wellness
article thumbnail

Sumser tech spotlight: This hiring tool ‘distinguishes itself’

HRExecutive

There is a deep well of technology, but it is really big tech. Once Catalyte turned 10 (in 2010), Rosenbaum began incubating what was to become Arena. Most recruiting and talent acquisition providers steer clear of promising results because the data can be hard to acquire. He prefers to focus on loftier aspirations.

article thumbnail

People Analytics and HR-Tech Reading List

Littal Shemer

The book introduces these areas and guides on building the connectivity across domains required to establish well-rounded skills for individuals and best practices for organizations when applying advanced analytics to workforce data. “The book focuses on the use of information technologies in talent management. .”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Succession Planning: Essential Guide for HR

Analytics in HR

That reassures shareholders that the business is well taken care of long-term. If the organization has a well-defined job architecture with function descriptions and rewards based on responsibilities, this selection will be fairly accurate. So it makes sense to integrate talent and leadership development with succession planning.

article thumbnail

The Head of Talent Role: Challenges and Opportunities for Talent.

Strategic HCM

SuccessFactors Performance and Talent Management Blog. The Head of Talent Role: Challenges and Opportunities for Talent Managers / 4. A good number though, still regard talent development as a hygiene factor. Talent management in these companies can become an exercise in gap-filling and tactical recruiting.”

article thumbnail

2021 Corporate Human Capital Disclosures: Where’s the Beef? (i4cp login required)

i4cp

Data from a recent Institute for Corporate Productivity (i4cp) survey of respondents representing 131 global and national organizations suggests that fewer than half of companies (41%) publicly disclose any type of workforce diversity data; 27% don't publicly disclose important workforce metrics at all.