This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Colorado became the first state to regulate AI technology to protect against algorithmic discrimination. New York City spearheaded its Local Law 144 of 2021 that regulates the use of automated employment decision tools. The EU passed sweeping AI regulations this summer. Almeida predicts others to explore protections in 2025.
Discomfort Does Not Equal Discrimination A critical point from the court’s ruling is that feeling uncomfortable or disagreeing with DEI training does not amount to a hostile work environment. ” While some employees may feel uneasy during these discussions, discomfort alone does not render the training unlawful.
The PWFA is a federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. This law expands upon the protections offered by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) by focusing on accommodations rather than simply prohibiting discrimination.
In employment lawsuits, employee handbooks can either be a tool to help protect your company or a liability if not carefully maintained and updated. While there is no federal or state law that requires employers to have an employee handbook, it is best practice for employers to have one.
By the Human Resources Team in Keystones Risk Management Division An employee handbook is not legally required but is a best practice for a few reasons. A well-written handbook will also clarify expectations. Inconsistent treatment of employees can lead to poor morale and claims of discrimination.
Jonathan Segal, Duane Morris Ensure employee handbooks, for instance, explicitly state the organization’s position, and reinforce the policy through informational sessions or workshops. HR can also create easy-to-follow, accessible materials—such as FAQs, brochures or digital content—to help clarify the rules.
Perhaps the employer enjoys the notoriety of becoming the muse for a post on The Employer Handbook. And, better yet, why didn’t the employer relocate the fragrant fellow? Both are good questions. Predictably, the plaintiff complained. Then, an interactive dialogue ensued to try to accommodate him.
. : Step 2 Review HR Policies and Documentation The next step in an HR audit is to review the organizations existing HR policies, employee handbooks, contracts, and other documentation. Examples: Employee Handbook Review: Check for compliance with the Industrial Disputes Act , Maternity Benefit Act , and Equal Pay Act.
Monitor for Discrimination and Retaliation Retaliation against employees who disclose a mental health condition or request accommodations is illegal. Your workplace should have clear policies around: Reasonable accommodations Mental health leave The process for disclosing a mental health issue 4.
Colloquially, today’s topic is “reverse religious discrimination.” Title VII does not permit employers to discriminate against employees who fail to comply with their employer’s religion. And that’s religious discrimination too. Many courts have examined this issue.
But smoking gun evidence in discrimination cases is rare. Does that sound like discrimination to you? Yesterday’s post discussed how direct evidence “proves impermissible discriminatory bias without additional inference or presumption,” i.e., the proverbial smoking gun. Well, most employers, that is. It does to me.
Certain demographics of employees (like white, cisgender males) may worry that they’ll face discrimination because of what they’ve heard and misunderstood about DEI. Some critics may come armed with national statistics about discrimination, but your job in HR isn’t debating national politics.
Discrimination or harassment: Discriminating against or harassing anyone at work automatically causes conflict, which the victim may choose to report to HR. Include a section on this procedure in the employee handbook , and make sure new hires (digitally) sign a document stating they have received and read the handbook.
Increased Trust and Engagement Transparency fosters trust among employees by promoting a sense of fairness and reducing suspicions of pay discrimination. Transparent pay policies ensure that salary decisions are based on objective criteria, reducing the risk of unconscious bias or discrimination.
Mishandling absences risks claims of unfair dismissal or discrimination, making a proactive approach essential. Ensure the policy is accessible, perhaps via an employee handbook or intranet, and review it annually to align with legal updates. It should outline reporting procedures, pay entitlements (e.g.,
Employers are now required to be more vigilant in crafting job advertisements, ensuring that the language used is free from any form of discrimination. This shift, she notes, aims to combat wage discrimination and ensure a more equitable hiring process.
Increased Trust and Engagement : Promotes fairness: Pay transparency can help to reduce suspicions of pay discrimination by demonstrating that compensation is based on objective criteria. Regulatory Environment Gender and pay equity: There are many laws that prohibit discrimination based on gender in terms of pay and benefits.
An onsite manager alleged race discrimination, but the court never reached the substance of her claims. Read the opinion The Facts: She Worked Onsite, Took Instructionsand Still Lost Her Case A Black woman who managed cafeteria operations at several Philadelphia charter schools alleged race discrimination and retaliation.
When employees allege discrimination under the ADA, it’s their burden to prove bias not the employer’s burden to defend every business decision. A recent Seventh Circuit case reinforces that when employers apply clear policies consistently, even imperfect decisions wont amount to discrimination.
Heres how to stay ahead: Use tools designed to reduce discrimination Audit AI decisions regularly Document how fairness is measured and maintained Ethical AI isnt just the right thing to do. Its how you stay compliant with anti-discrimination laws and build a culture of trust.
Increased rationalization for unethical behavior Workers feel justified in similar misbehavior if those at the top lie, cheat, cook the books, discriminate, etc. Clearly state in your employee handbook that dishonest behavior is unacceptable and not tolerated. Punish wrongdoings Create strong company policies and follow through.
For example, discrimination or retaliation claims tied to PUMP Act violations could lead to six-figure settlements. Update handbooks to include clear lactation break and space policies. The DOL’s action underscores a growing focus on protecting nursing mothers’ rights. HR must prioritize compliance to avoid similar fines.
Indeed, in this particular lawsuit, the employer argued that its arbitration agreement with the employee covered his age discrimination claims with the PHRC and required that any such disputes be decided exclusively through mandatory binding arbitration. There’s a Supreme Court case called Gilmer v. The answer was yes.
The court dismissed her ADA discrimination claim because she didnt show she was meeting the universitys legitimate expectations at the time of her termination. That doomed the discrimination claim. But the retaliation claim? She was verbally admonished for memory lapses related to contract work. She received a written warning.
Common areas include: Wage and hour laws Anti-discrimination regulations (EEOC, ADA, etc.) Legal and Litigation Risks Employment-related lawsuits can arise from: Wrongful termination Harassment or discrimination Retaliation claims Breach of employment contract Violations of privacy rights 3. HR Risk Mitigation Strategies 1.
Safer Workplaces : Starting in January, employers must take active steps to address and eliminate sexual harassment, discrimination, and hostile work environments. Update Policies : Ensure your employee handbook and HR systems reflect these changes. Small businesses have until August 2025 to comply.
Employers should refer to the job abandonment policy in their employee handbook for specifics. If one employee is terminated after three no-call/no-shows, you must follow the same rule for everyone to maintain fairness and avoid discrimination claims. Apply job abandonment rules fairly to all employees to prevent discrimination claims.
Just ask Clorox, now facing a revived gender discrimination claim despite its well-meaning initiatives. TL;DR: A white, male Clorox salesperson alleged age, race, and gender discrimination after he was let go during a company reorganization. The lower court noted that “a diversity policy alone does not establish discrimination.”
Especially if you’re gonna claim discrimination when you eventually get fired. The manager alleged that the real reason for the termination was age discrimination, pointing to ageist remarks from two supervisors, one of whom literally called him “old” and lamented that he “does not retain information.”
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission , the federal discrimination watchdog sued an employer that maintained and applied that policy and violated the Americans with Disabilities Act. But don’t just take my word for it. According to a recent press release from the U.S.
Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) , an essential piece of federal legislation that protects people with disabilities from discrimination in the workplace is also an issue. Discrimination laws You should consider general anti-discrimination laws, such as the Civil Rights Act.
Outdated Employee Handbooks If your employee handbook hasnt been updated in years, it could be doing more harm than good. How to avoid it: Review and update your handbook annually to ensure it aligns with the latest legal requirements and company policies. Also, stay updated on labor laws to avoid compliance issues.
Make the policy easy to find — include it in onboarding , the employee handbook , or on the intranet. Examples include bullying, discrimination, or unsafe work conditions. It also helps to address conflicts before they escalate into major issues or legal action. What does a grievance policy cover?
A Rare Sanction, A Clear Line Crossed The underlying case involved an employee who alleged religious discrimination after being fired for expressing pro-life views she considered grounded in her Christian faith. Following the verdict, the court ordered the employer to notify its workforce that it may not discriminate based on religion.
HR policies and procedures: Review the company’s HR framework, including handbooks, onboarding processes, performance management systems, disciplinary procedures, and training programs. Risks and liabilities: Investigate existing or hidden risks such as lawsuits, discrimination claims, union issues, compliance violations (e.g.,
In a recent decision, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiff’s age discrimination claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).
TL;DR: A university employee sued for discrimination after not receiving a permanent promotion. When leadership restructured the department and opened a national search for the permanent role, the employee chose not to apply—and later sued for discrimination, alleging bias based on his ethnicity and religion.
Their services include: Employee Handbook Creation: Drafting and maintaining employee handbooks that outline company policies, expectations, and workplace conduct. PEOs assist in developing comprehensive HR policies that align with industry standards and regulatory requirements.
Employer polices and guidelines A company’s stance on political gear should be clearly outlined in its employee handbook , particularly under its dress code policy. If your company chooses to allow political attire, it is crucial to set specific boundaries regarding what is considered appropriate.
TL;DR: A federal court just refused to toss a cocktail servers disability discrimination lawsuit against a well-known casino and resort. She sued under the ADA and state law, claiming failure to accommodate, disability discrimination, and retaliation. She had a medical condition requiring supportive shoes.
Protecting Labor and Employment Rights : AI systems should not violate or undermine workers’ right to organize, health and safety rights, wage and hour rights, and anti-discrimination and anti-retaliation protections. Using AI to Enable Workers: AI systems should assist, complement, and enable workers, and improve job quality.
” “Upon information and belief,” claims the plaintiff, “[his] applications were disregarded by Defendant due to discrimination of his race.” I’m unaware of any court that has specifically found a defendant liable for discrimination based on implicit bias.
Last month, a federal appellate court concluded that training delays, a denied vacation request, and a transfer to a different shift that interfered with the plaintiff’s childcare arrangements could all support a discrimination claimeven though the plaintiff never lost his job. City of St. Louis, Missouri.
But because she had just complained about racial harassment, disability discrimination, and unpaid wages, the timing raised red flags. She filed internal complaints and an EEOC charge alleging discrimination and unpaid wages. The Employer Handbook Bottom Line This wasnt about $15. Three days later, she was terminated.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 318,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content